Yes...
I have changed the extractor FM in the roosource tables to point to the RT extractor and it worked fine.
It is pointing to a non-retail extractor and by mapping to the correct FM it worked fine.
Yes...
I have changed the extractor FM in the roosource tables to point to the RT extractor and it worked fine.
It is pointing to a non-retail extractor and by mapping to the correct FM it worked fine.
Hey Vadim,
I don't necessarily have a business purpose to do that, I was just curious if it worked on other packages in general, just picked Copy package for an example.
But same could apply if I need to allocate say, 100USD to BAS(Group1) which has mixed currencies, the system should then apply the exchange rates correctly right?
For example, this would allocate the amounts in the Pre-Allocated Advertising Account to the Advertising P&L Line using the Net Sales of the Entities:
*RUNALLOCATION
*FACTOR=USING/TOTAL
*DIM ACCOUNT WHAT=PREADVERT; WHERE=ZFAADVERT; USING=NETSALES; TOTAL=<<<
*DIM ENTITY WHAT=INPUT_ENTITY; WHERE=BAS(Group1); USING=<<<; TOTAL=<<<
*DIM RPTCURRENCY WHAT=LC; WHERE=<<<; USING=<<<; TOTAL=<<<
.....
*ENDALLOCATION
So in this example, if I run DEFAULT (with FXTRANS), it should allocate those dollars correctly right?
Thanks,
Alexander
Hi Andrej,
Historically it happened that Validation Mask was designed for assembly, not for data collection. The way of how it is expected to be used is described here:
That's why in Data Collection Maintenance you observe a "cut" version of validation mask feature. In fact, it was simply a separate implementation not related to Validation Mask Maintenance.
Regards,
Sergiy
Hi Mahesh
Thanks For your Reply
Customer will deduct TDS amount from invoice at the time of payment
This TDS is related to payment only not for invoice
Please advise on this
Regards
Srini
most likely i think the issue is with the database replication that you did.
However, I don't know what the exact difference is, but my guess is that the scripts that create the new database do generate some type of id at some point - meaning, they don't just generate a bunch of empty tables.
Jon-Paul Boyd wrote:
Take a look here Availability of AWS Hana dev SPS7 now that Studio/Client revision 70 available?
Thomas indicates running Studio 70 with earlier appliance versions is no problem.
Yes but upgrading your Studio version won't upgrade the SAPUI5 version. UI5 is content stored in the database and only upgraded by applying newer revisions/SP levels.
MS Access isn't supported yet as an underlying database for Design Studio UNX universes.
Supported Universe Types
With SAP Business Objects Design Studio 1.2, only single source, relational .unx universes on Microsoft SQL or Sybase IQ as underlying database are supported.
Cheers,
Xavier
Hi Racha,
I give my exact requirement.
I have a ddlb field1 (attribute) in CN01 of View1.
Whenever I select a particular ddlb list item the value in the field2 must be set to a default value and this atribute (field2) is in CN02 of View2 within the same component.
Let me know how can i set the value in field2 based on selection made in field1.
Please Help
Regards,
Naveenn
Hello
I'm facing a problem in a report where I want to use a dynamic selection screen.
I got my internal table with e.g. 20 entries. In a LOOP I want to add with every entry a new parameter in my selection screen. So far so good, i already finished this, but its not that comfortable for me, because I wanted it some easier way if possible with field symbols.
I want in every LOOP entry that the content of one entry variable will be given to the parameters name or description. Is this possible? Any clever solution for this?
At the moment it looks pretty undynamical, because I had a limited amount of fields.
************************************************************************
INITIALIZATION.
************************************************************************LOOP AT lt_lxe ASSIGNING <ls_lxe>.
mac_para sy-tabix <ls_lxe>-language.
ENDLOOP.
DEFINE mac_para.
case &1.
when 1.
selection-screen begin of block s03 with frame title text-z02.
parameter: p_01 as checkbox.
%_p_01_%_app_%-text = &2.
when 2.
parameter: p_02 as checkbox.
%_p_02_%_app_%-text = &2.
when 3.
parameter: p_03 as checkbox.
%_p_03_%_app_%-text = &2.
when 4.
parameter: p_04 as checkbox.
%_p_04_%_app_%-text = &2.
when 5.
parameter: p_05 as checkbox.
%_p_05_%_app_%-text = &2.
when 6.
parameter: p_06 as checkbox.
%_p_06_%_app_%-text = &2.
when 7.
parameter: p_07 as checkbox.
%_p_07_%_app_%-text = &2.
when 8.
parameter: p_08 as checkbox.
%_p_08_%_app_%-text = &2.
when 9.
parameter: p_09 as checkbox.
%_p_09_%_app_%-text = &2.
when 10.
parameter: p_10 as checkbox.
%_p_10_%_app_%-text = &2.
when 11.
parameter: p_11 as checkbox.
%_p_11_%_app_%-text = &2.
when 12.
parameter: p_12 as checkbox.
%_p_12_%_app_%-text = &2.
selection-screen end of block s03.
when others.
endcase.
END-OF-DEFINITION.
Regards
Michael
Thanks All,
Looks like upgrading env with BO 4.0 would help. and if we need to hang with current env we have to go for Macro Sln ( Don't want to try that as of now )
Best !
Deep
please post your issue at BPC forum.
I don't believe this is a size related problem. It is most likely a complexity/formatting problem in the file that does not work. I suggest you either use the logfile from the wordservice to show the problem or systematically reduce the complexity of the failing file to find the problem.
Regards,
Gary
If you want to plan PD is mandatory if you are not using reorder based plg
Hi Hareesh,
Our scenario is IDOC to file.......
I was searching solution for a problem of a t-code..
I have found a mistake for not updating correct ans and thread status, although it has the correct answer..
This is the discussion Settings for MB1.. transactions
I hope it should not be like this..
Regards
In your question it's mentioned as IDOC but it's the same process..
Refer to the below blog -
Hi All,
the root issue can be within Embedded Search or within your TREX environment.
For Embedded Search:
See SAP Note 1764978 - Error when activating ESH connectors without ODP
This is the bug and solved in NW AS 7.31 SP06 the workaround is to execute RODPS_ODP_IMG.
Still mentioned in this thread.
Or Embedded Search is not able to create the indexes on TREX side because there are already exists.
Workaround:
1) Delete all indexes via program: ESH_ADM_INDEX_ALL_SC
2) Check and Delete all indexes in TREXADMIN or the TREX-Admin Tool
3) Check and delete all indexes on operation system level
4) restart TREX demon / service
all of theses 4 steps must be done.
Best regards
Frank
gen_row_num_by_group(column-1)