Hi MozzaM,
Yes Your document detail is very much helpful. I created TAXK1 & TAXM1 fields in new table & assigned to my ZTLH condition type, I differently make permutation & combination.
If UTXJ is working --Tax code O1 taxable then another ZTLH is also fetching O0 from FTXP.instead of L0
If ZTLH is working Tax L1 then UTXJ is not working as it is catching tax code L0 (instead ofO0 ) from FTXP.I properly checked field catalogue, access sequence but not successful.
Your priing is not tax jurisdiction based so working fine. It is MWST with simple condition type.whilst I have tax ujrisdiction so very much complex. I shall check with ABAP why it is behaving strange? I shall post once I get feedback from ABAPer.My both access sequences are different. UTX1-->for UTXJ New ZTX1 with TAXK1 & TAXM1 but behaving like TAXK and TAXM.
Can you suggest what is route cause or any other way to work around?
Appreciate your documents & reply/advice.